Re: Graphic converter query - transparency

Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > My point is that although broadband lines are indeed subject to
variable
> > download conditions, the only person who can say if it's "significant"
> > is the person using it. 
> 
> And my point is that that's wrong and that there are established methods
> for *****sing this sort of thing that avoid the subjectivity that you
> insist on applying.

So you're saying that if I'm generally only getting 50% of my download
bandwidth, I should consider that "normal" ?

It's a good thing I don't consider that normal, because I would have
been wrong.

As I've already said: in almost all cases where I've been getting what
_I_ consider to be significantly sub-par download speed it's been due to
a diagnosable, fixable problem that I've diagnosed and fixed, or it's
been tem****ary congestion upstream.

You can deny it all you want but it won't stop it being true.

Jim
-- 
'Cloverfield' in nine words: "What is it?!" "We're gonna die!" BOOM!
Roll credits.

http://www.ursaminorbeta.co.uk
  http://twitter.com/greyareauk