Re: NeoOffice - be honest now

fChris Ridd <chrisridd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On 2008-05-18 11:29:38 +0100, me9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Bella Jones) said:
> 
> > I looked at Pages last night, then mellel, and then realised i went
> > through all this a couple of years ago.
> 
> And such is your satisfaction with Microsoft Word that you're doing it
> all over again :-)

Well, I was inspired by changing over to Address Book and iCal, perhaps
on the back of rearranging my living room - ie to have a bit of a
redecorate of the Mac...

I don't detest Word - probably cos I don't do anything complex on it.
But it would be nice to go a bit faster, or something.

> > what's the big deal with X11?  that's why i don't use open office. 
does
> > it involve Heavy Stuff?
> 
> X11 meant Open Office could treat the Mac just like other Unixes, and
> not really bother too much at making it usable.
> 
> Open Office 3 has ditched X11 for the Mac version, so is more "native",
> looks better, and obviously doesn't involve X11 on the Mac any more. 
> There's now no point having a special Neo Office version.

Oh right!  Will have a go then.  I must have misunderstood the recent
thread...


-- 
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk