Chris Ridd <chrisridd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 2008-05-14 18:48:39 +0100, usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Woody) said:
>
> > Chris Ridd <chrisridd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2008-05-14 18:09:25 +0100, usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Woody) said:
> >>
> >>> Chris Ridd <chrisridd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2008-05-14 16:00:54 +0100, chris <ithinkiam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Way back when I was using svn (about 2+ years ago), I found I
often had
> >>>>> to 'unwedge' the svn database that ran the repository on the
server. I
> >>>>> can't remember the exact incantation, but it's well do***ented in
the
> >>>>> docs. Could this be a solution?
> >>>>
> >>>> It could also be nature's way of telling you to use a less broken
VCS.
> >>>> Git and mercurial are popular, git probably more so.
> >>>
> >>> I don't care what the system is, as long as I can use something like
> >>> TortoiseSVN or clone on the mac and PC to operate it.
> >>>
> >>> Can I do that?
> >>
> >> There's a tortoise for one of them on Windows. Not so much on the Mac
> >> though :-(
> >
> > That is not so useful then. I like that way of working, but I am not
> > that religeous about VCS systems, as long as I can get it working.
>
> Git comes with a couple of Tk-based GUIs - gitk and git-gui. The
> Mac****ts ****t includes them both, so you can judge how ugly as sin they
> are :-)
Yes, you lost me at Mac****ts!
--
Woody
www.alienrat.com
|
