I appreciate your opinion of MS software to which you are fully entitled.
I would expect, however, that the reason for lack of response is the age
of
the software & OS version involved. There are most likely very few - if
any - participants in the newsgroup with a memory sharp enough to
accurately
recall that far back and those who might be willing to respond would want
to
confirm their suggestions first. That *might* be difficult since it's just
as unlikely that there happen to be folks tuned in here who have such a
configuration sitting around "just in case".
Responsible replies are not based on speculation & guesswork... or
obviously
prejudiced disinformation. The silence - unfortunate as it may be - is
based
on a matter of principle & newsgroup ettiquette observed by mature
individuals: If you don't have a constructive reply to offer, don't reply
at
all.
--
Regards |:>)
Bob Jones
[MVP] Office:Mac
"Anybody" <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:300420080900476549%anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <uCr0Q8iqIHA.2492@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "CyberTaz"
> <typegeneraltaz1ATcomcastdotnet> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your insightful & constructive contribution - perhaps you
can
>> provide some equally enlightening suggestions on how the OP might
"Switch
>> to
>> Apple's iWork..." while running OS *9.2*.
>
> Since I was the only person to offer ANY answer at all it is apparently
> the only correct answer, which is no surprise since I've been forced to
> try to get decent images out of various versions of Microsoft's garbage
> for years with absolutely no success.
|
