Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password

Mac > Mac Systems > Re: QT 6 was go...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 11 Topic 23874 of 24928
 Post > Topic >>

Re: QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?

by sbt <dogbreath@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 05:40 PM

In article <starsabre-056822.19323915052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
jt august <starsabre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> 
> BTW, what do you use to ex****t QT vids to mpeg2?
> 

I usually use ffmpegX.

-- 
Spenser



 11 Posts in Topic:
QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?
 jt august <starsabre@[  2008-05-14 02:05:34 
Re: QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?
 JF Mezei <jfmezei.spam  2008-05-14 02:05:22 
Re: QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?
 jt august <starsabre@[  2008-05-16 00:32:40 
Re: QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?
 sbt <dogbreath@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 17:40:04 
Re: QT 6 was good, why is 7 not?
 JF Mezei <jfmezei.spam  2008-05-15 20:59:32 
Private Message
    2008-05-15 18:24:18 
Private Message
    2008-05-15 21:48:30 
Private Message
    2008-05-15 19:18:37 
Private Message
    2008-05-16 08:00:27 
Private Message
    2008-05-16 08:36:21 
Private Message
    2008-05-16 07:35:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 19:10:43 CDT 2008.