Re: Super Duper in MacFormat magazine

On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:48:58 -0700, Richard Maine wrote:

> salgud <spamboy6547@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:12:45 -0500, Jolly Roger wrote:
> 
>>> Again, there is no "full" or "shareware" version.
>> 
>> Ok, if we're splitting hairs here, then I meant the registered (full
>> featured) or the non-registered (crippled) version. Is that ok?
> 
> I doubt it.
> 
> A. There aren't 2 versions at all. Period. There is one version, which
> you can register after getting a registration code. It isn't just
> "splitting hairs" to point out that the number 1 is different from 2.
> There is only 1 version; not 2. It doesn't matter what kind of words you
> try to use to distinguish the 2; there aren't 2 to distinguish.
> 
> B. I would be incredibly shocked if anyone could legally get by with
> distributing a copy that had already been registered. That's about as
> close as I canimagine to a registered "version." That would sort of
> obviate the whole point of registration. Someone might arrange
> distribute a copy with a separate registration code, but that would be a
> quite different thing.

Ok. Let's try this, a simple quiz for both of you. Fill in the blanks. 
There are two ___________  of Super Duper. One __________  has full
features. The other ____________  has only limited features unless it is
registered. 
Thanks!