Re: Cocoa Newbie Question.

On Jun 13, 10:52=A0am, Gregory Weston <u...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <effaf51c-4c50-4a6c-b92a-1d4657e3c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
> =A0piscesboy <oraclmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Jun 12, 4:30=A0pm, Gregory Weston <u...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <0ca11222-ff52-45fa-a4e1-e00919c90...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > =A0piscesboy <oraclmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > This post could have just ended 5 posts back but everyone
> > > > > > here has nothing better to do than insult anyone else's
intellig=
ence.
>
> > > > > Wait. Stop right there.
>
> > > > > I want you to look back at this thread - this mess that *you*
star=
ted -
> > > > > and find a single place where your *intelligence* was insulted.
Or=

> > > > > commented on in any way, for that matter.
>
> > > > Are you blind, Greg?
>
> > > The inability to see things that aren't really there isn't
blindness,
> > > last time I checked.
>
> > > > "A person who is struggling with link commands such as you were is
> > > > quite likely to be unaware of the need to type "./test". And since
> > > > your first response completely missed the point of what I was
> > > > saying, I thought it necessary to try again. "
>
> > > > Now who wrote that?
>
> > > That would be Dave. Read it again very carefully and say with a
straig=
ht
> > > face that it comments on your intelligence. Perhaps you need a
refresh=
er
> > > on the difference between intelligence and knowledge?
>
> > I'm not even out of high school yet,
>
> Quelle surprise!
>
> > and I know the difference between
> > knowledge known and intelligence being a potential for learning.
>
> Really? Because you're demonstrating very well that you don't by
> suggesting that someone who didn't make assumptions about your knowledge
> implicitly called you an idiot.
>
> > He was insulting my intelligence by saying I was too dim to figure out
> > how to run a program.
>
> No. He simply suggested you might lack the knowledge. Period. Your
> intelligence was *never* called into question.
>
> > Reading it again with straight face and middle finger extended towards
> > Greg that it is insulting to my and every newbie's intelligence. If
> > you fail to see that by rationalizing around it, and false assumptions
> > about my intent when Dave's intent is plain in his post you are a
> > bigot.
>
> No. You continue to misread what other people are saying to you. Grow
up.
>
> > > I've listened to your argument. It's rubbish because you're
complainin=
g
> > > about things that never happened and responding with functional non
> > > sequiturs.
>
> > There's a post above mine that is quoted by me and written by Dave
> > that is concrete evidence that it did happen.
>
> No it's not, because it doesn't say what you think it says. You have
> misunderstood. Get that through your skull. Use a hammer if you need to.
>
> > And whenever it happens, I do not let such insults slide
>
> Where I grew up, hypersensitive people who don't let (perceived) insults
> slide die young.


Oh, really? Maybe you should go back there and learn some manners from
some folks who don't take any crap from bigots who don't recognize
that they've insulted anyone. Why don't you grow up and find some
balls to insult someone your own age instead of picking on people who
don't have as much experience as you do. Where I grew up guys like you
ended up skinned alive and hung from the goal posts of my high school.




>
> > I don't care how many of you Daves or
> > Gregs there are on this board I will always call you on it.
>
> Clearly. Even if you're wrong.
>
> > And if Dave wasn't such a wuss he'd do his own talking on his own
> > behalf.
>
> He's probably killfiled you.
>
> > > I'll say again: Your response to him, being irrelevant to his point,
> > > implied that you did not understand his point. Following up with a
> > > clarification, as he did, is extremely appropriate. The only one
who's=

> > > been condescending or insulting in this thread is you.
>
> > It is so fruitless arguing with someone who doesn't see the light of
> > day.
>
> Odd that you of all people would say such a thing. But an excellent
> point. Ta.
>
> > This attitude of yours is extremely condescending towards
> > everyone.
>
> False. My attitude isn't toward "everyone," just you. And it's not
> condescending to you.
>
> G
>
> --
> "Harry?" Ron's voice was a mere whisper. "Do you smell something ...
burni=
ng?"
> =A0 =A0- Harry Potter and the Odor of the Phoenix