Re: Magnifying JPEGs viewed in Safari?

In message <doraymeRidThis-A7CA7F.10592106052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
  dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <slrng1ufgr.15qa.g.kreme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> In message
<doraymeRidThis-0B1751.13012903052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>   dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > what would dialup users or slow broadband think?).
>> 
>> Sorry, but I stopped worrying about dialup users 6 years ago when the
last
>> person in my family finally got ADSL. I hear there are still people on
>> dialup, but I could not prove it.

> Why did you ever worry about dialup? Do you make websites only for your 
> family?

Back in 1995 worrying about dialup was sensible as the vast majority of
your visitors were using dialup. Now-a-days, nearly none are.  

>> > The advantage is bandwidth and clarity, especially bandwidth. No one 
>> > wants to download a 2592 px wide pic if they are only interested in 
>> > seeing it at 400px.
>> 
>> But they take the same amount of time (that is, 'none') to download! :)

> This is not true for many people (not you or your family who maybe have 
> superfast), even on what is broadly known as broadband. And it is 
> demonstrably false when you take into account a set of pictures.

Did you see the smilie?  Did you?


-- 
"Master, what is the difference between a humanistic, monastic system of
	belief in which wisdom is sought by means of an apparently nonsensical
	system of questions and answers, and a lot of mystic gibberish made up on
	the spur of the moment?" Wen considered this for some time, and a last
	said: "A fish!"