Re: The Battle of the Browsers

In article 
<doraymeRidThis-18E29C.12054706122006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article 
> <paul.sture.nospam-B03D9F.00381206122006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Paul Sture <paul.sture.nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > In article <1165321596.161976.151660@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  "Bruce L Grubb" <bgrubb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Get a WYSIWYG website program not designed by morons. Amaya
> > > <http://www.w3.org/Amaya/>
by the W3C should be your tool of choice.
> > > Most other WYSIWYG website programs use way too much javascript
because
> > > for the most part they are designed by either morons or idiots.
> > 
> > It may generate good quality code, but it's bloated and the GUI is 
> > severely lacking.
> 
> So how does that make it good quality?

Oops. I'll revise that to read:

I have to assume that if Amaya has the sup****t of W3C it should generate 
good quality code. However the utility itself suffers from code bloat to 
the point of being unacceptably slow, and there appears to be no way to 
adjust the fonts and colours used by the GUI itself to enhance 
legibility.

Well, I  was going to put up a screen shot for everyone, but it's doing 
a spinning beachball on me, and I just can't bothered with it anymore.

It's hit Trash.

-- 
Paul Sture