Re: Identifying the image type within a PDF file?

In article <1hl9bbk.1rvydqj12ge0l1N%mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Mike Rosenberg) wrote:

> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > Go and see it for yourself
> 
> You're told that you blow things out of pro****tion and that you go on
> and on at length, and your response?  You blow it out of pro****tion and
> go on and on at length about it.
> 
> I read this thread as it was taking place, I've reread it since.  You've
> already heard what I have to say about it.

You are being unfair to me. You made errors and I pointed them 
out. You have not at all answered my protests. You show no 
awareness of the actual details of the beginning of the thread. 

It should be pretty obvious who the real driving force behind the 
continuation of this thread is? It is Balderstone (who won't shut 
up) and such as you who keep making bad and unfair mistakes in 
criticism of me. If you do not want to put up, then shut up and 
you will see how quickly all this stops. 

Sue made a true point and I acknowledged it. You have made a 
dishonest hash of things by darting out from the side, saying 
things out of context, pretending to have read things carefully 
when you could not possible have. Quoting me out of context and 
so on.

Look, please, there is a chance we could get on but you must not 
be unfair to me. Surely this is not too much to ask. There are 
two ways for you to do this. (1) To look fairly at the details. 
(2) To just leave it alone (as I am sure, wiser heads are doing 
right now)

The biggest offence against the Baldestone gang seems to be that 
one will defend against unfair attacks by them The Mafia does not 
like insubordination either.

-- 
dorayme