In article <75515$4833006a$26697@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Edwin <thorne25@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article
> > <b43839ca-daa7-4baf-a5ba-9cd1157d29d1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Edwin <thorne25@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On May 8, 11:14 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> In article <mlFUj.541$C8....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>>
> >>> "weedhopper" <wendelhop...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> I don't know if I really want to buy a new Mac now.
> >>>> With all the lies and ba****ng the Mac Zealots seem to constantly do
- is
> >>>> it
> >>>> worth it?
> >>>> Market share facts from the new Mac Zealot Bible;
> >>>>
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/re****t.aspx?qprid=10&qpmr=24&qpdt=1&q...
> >>>> al=1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=110
> >>>> March 7.48%
> >>>> April 7.38%
> >>> Yup. Statistics fluctuate, that's why there are such things as
margins
> >>> of error, confidence intervals, etc.
> >>>
> >>> But the overall trend is unmistakable:
> >>>
> >>> Apple's share of overall web usage is going slowly but steadily up.
> >> http://www.systemshootouts.org/images/mac_sales_market_share_lg.gif
> >
> > And that chart sup****ts my claim.
>
> Get your eyes checked.
Web usage has shown steady gains since 2004. That chart shows steady
gains in market share over the same time period.
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix
with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on
Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
|
