In article <c3799$482db496$7869@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Glorb <Glorb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <5e9bd$482daf22$6035@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Glorb <Glorb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> Alan Baker wrote:
> >>> In article <mVhXj.9251$hv2.4276@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>> "weedhopper" <whopper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Impressive!!
> >>>>
> >>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8614
> >>>>
> >>>> "Apple's global market share is only 3.3 percent among the 69.5
million
> >>>> PC
> >>>> ****pped in the March quarter, according to IDC. "
> >>> "But that market share tally is up from 2.5 percent in the March
quarter
> >>> a year ago. Why do those Apple gains matter? Those Mac sales most
likely
> >>> came at the expense of a new Windows machine."
> >>>
> >>> BTW, what is the whole subject of that post?
> >>>
> >>> "Microsoft¹s elephant in the OS room: Apple"
> >>>
> >>> The whole thing is about how the Mac is making an impact into
> >>> Microsoft's market.
> >>>
> >>> 'TR¹s audience is comprised of the folks that actually implement
stuff.
> >>> It¹s not the fanboy crowd. One sample response from an IT exec:
> >>>
> >>> "I started out as a Windows/Novell man, but now I advocate for Mac
> >>> purchases and make them as much as I can. Two main reasons I do
this: 1)
> >>> on the whole, they require less time to sup****t, much less time,
> >>> actually, because the OS runs better and there are fewer malware
> >>> concerns; 2) I practice the philosophy of keeping it simple. Mac
> >>> software is easy to use and, more im****tantly, easy to teach to my
IT
> >>> employees."'
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/04/25results.html
> >> fiscal 2007 second quarter ended March 31, 2007
> >> Apple ****pped 1,517,000 Macintosh® computers
> >>
> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/07/25results.html
> >> 2007 third quarter ended June 30, 2007
> >> Apple ****pped 1,764,000 Macintosh® computers
> >>
> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/10/22results.html
> >> fiscal 2007 fourth quarter ended September 29, 2007
> >> Apple ****pped 2,164,000 Macintosh® computers
> >>
> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/01/22results.html
> >> fiscal 2008 first quarter ended December 29, 2007
> >> Apple ****pped 2,319,000 Macintosh® computers
> >>
> >> The above shows Apple ****pped 7,764,000 Macs in calendar year
> >> 2007.
> >>
> >> http://gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=584210
> >> Worldwide PC ****pments totaled 271.2 million units in 2007
> >>
> >> 7,764,000/271,200,000 = .0286
> >>
> >> Mac worldwide market share for 2007 = 2.86 %
> >>
> >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/04/23results.html
> >> fiscal 2008 second quarter ended March 29, 2008
> >> Q2'08 Apple ****pped 2,289,000 Macintosh® computers
> >>
> >> The above shows Apple ****pped 2,289, Macs in the first
calender
> >> quarter of 2008.
> >>
> >> http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=648619
> >> Worldwide PC ****pments totaled 71.1 million units in the first
quarter
> >> of 2008
> >>
> >> 2,289,000/71,100,000 = .0321
> >>
> >> Mac worldwide market share for Q1'08 = 3.21%
> >>
> >> Mac gain in worldwide market share from 2007 to 2008 =
> >>
> >> .0321 - .0286 = 0.0035% or 0.35%
> >
> > Apple growth Q1'08: 51%
> > Overall growth Q1'08: 12%.
>
> Somebody get Alan a math tutor!
Mac Q1'08 / Mac Q1' 07 = 1.5088
Those figures were provided by you, above.
Your last reference states (and I quote):
"Gartner Says Worldwide PC Market Grew 12 Percent in First Quarter of
2008"
71,057,000 / 63,250,000 = 1.1234
But remember: those figures include Mac sales.
So if we subtract the Mac sales:
(71,057,000 - 2,289,000) / (63,250,000 - 1,517,000) = 1.1139
IOW, while the Mac's sales grew 51% year over year, the rest of the PC
market only grew 11%.
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix
with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on
Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
|
