Re: changing application icon

"ed" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> stated in post
c191676b-0493-4708-a5ac-88393199b813@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 on
5/14/08
6:51 PM:

> On May 14, 6:37 pm, Snit <use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "ed" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> stated in post
>> news-489BDE.18350014052...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 on 5/14/08 6:35 PM:
>>> In article <C450DF58.B9483%use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>  Snit <use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>  Ok...
>> 
>>>>> no go- just revert changes.  i tried w/ both built in apps
(automator in
>>>>> screenshot) and apps i installed.  are you running leopard?
>> 
>>>>> http://www.atwistedweb.com/DOCS/changeIcon3.png
>> 
>>>> I am running Leopard... it works with users but not groups:
>> 
>>>>     <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/make_owner.mov>
>> 
>>> ahh, you have to select yourself from the list- it didn't even cross
my
>>> mind that "make *ME* the owner" would require me selecting ME from the
>>> list first.  :D  
>> 
>> Well, um... no comment.  :)
> 
> i think it's the first / second person tense in that dialog that threw
> me- it's very current user focused.

Well, it lists the current user as "me"...

>>> the command line is wya more user friendly- it does exactly what you
>>> tell it to, no more, no less, no added fuss and muss.  :D
>> 
>> To each their own... I use a bit of both but find I use the GUI more
and
>> more.  I am quite happy that Apple added ACLs to the GUI.  They work
fine
>> for *some* of us.  :)
> 
> what you mean is apple added a subset of acl's to the gui-
> unfortunately, it was the subset that was easily replicated w/ regular
> old unix group permissions.  :P

It adds enough for my needs - nothing like the ACLs I use to use with a
FirstClass server, but that would be gross overkill for most people.

-- 
Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe.