"Mitch" <mitch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:110520080950487746%mitch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Y5CVj.35869$3v1.34068@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, weedhopper
> <wendelhopper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Mitch" <mitch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:100520081433365734%mitch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Finally we have a differently-styled small laptop to compare to MBA,
>> > but it is again far too different to compare directly.
>> >
>> > Buyers re****t horrible performance, major tweaks necessary, short
>> > charge life, too-glossy display, and lots of bad trade-offs. All
users
>> > seem to have had to revert to earlier software versions to get
mediocre
>> > performance. None have thought it compared well to peers.
>>
>> Who would it's peers be? I am looking for a notebook. but there are so
>> many
>> seemingly good ones out there. I want a small, lightweight unit. The
>> MacAir is one that draws my interest, but there are so many that are
>> similar
>> to it .
>
> The first sentence sounds like you don't think it has many peers, and
> the last sounds like you know of many. Whazzup?
By its "peers", I mean the ones you know of. It's easier for me to get
an
answer from you, rather than comb through a bunch of specs. There are a
bunch out there, I am only interested in the ones that are comparable.
Sorry that my composition wasn't clear to you.
|
