in article 4758fecc$0$7427$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael at
mitchinsatmac.com wrote on 7/12/07 6:26 PM:
> On 2007-12-06 09:56:18 +1100, Nigel <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>
>> in article 47568b28$0$7433$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael at
>> mitchinsatmac.com wrote on 5/12/07 9:48 PM:
>>
>>> I recently took delivery of a new 20" iMac, 2.4GHz and took the option
>>> of upgrading the HD to 500GB.
>>> Looking at system profiler though, I see that the capacity of my HD is
>>> shown as 465.76GB, with a lesser amount available due to the usual
>>> suspects.
>>> I would have thought that the capacity shown should be 500GB?
>>> Any thoughts or answers?
>>> I have emailed my supplier with this question but no answer yet, so I
>>> thought I'd "ask the audience'
>>> Thanks
>>> Mike
>>>
>> Indeed, as Andrew said, it never is what you end up with but always
less.
>> In California (where else) there was a class action lawsuit of the
issue and
>> Seagate have agreed to refund 5% of the cost but I bet that wont apply
here.
>>
>> See
>>
>>
http://apcmag.com/7449/seagate_offers_cash_to_customers_for_missing_megabyte
>> s
>>
>> Nigel
>> BrisVegas
>
> Yeah, I thought that was the case, it just seemed like a lot of wasted
space.
> That's life I guess.
> Thanks for the response guys.
> Incidently Nigel, I tried to access the link above but the message was
> "cannot find the page" even though the magazine site comes up??
> Mike
>
That will be the return wrap buggering up the URL (see the "s" is on the
next line)
Nigel
|
