Re: So Leopard is just another mog?

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:48:03 GMT, Emma Grey <gone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>Hi y'all
>
>The message I got from Dale's thread is that Leopard isn't exactly
>exciting - a bit like Vista wasn't, perhaps (for those creatures we do
>not speak of).
>
>Does anyone want to dispute this, and encourage me to take the trouble
>to upgrade from 10.4.10? - which in my experience is the most stable OS
>for a long time.
>
>An open invitation for comment.

After I took the tour of new features in Leopard I came to the conclusion
that Leopard is the Vista of Macs and thus not worth bothering with.

>Emma

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
I do not represent atheists or atheism