Re: So Leopard is just another mog?

In article <MrNoSpam-74E548.15381429102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Dale Stanbrough <MrNoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Emma Grey <gone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi y'all
> > 
> > The message I got from Dale's thread is that Leopard isn't exactly
> > exciting - a bit like Vista wasn't, perhaps (for those creatures we do
> > not speak of).
> > 
> > Does anyone want to dispute this, and encourage me to take the trouble
> > to upgrade from 10.4.10? - which in my experience is the most stable
OS
> > for a long time.
> > 
> > An open invitation for comment.
> 
> 
> I'd still update (and did, of course :-). Despite all the silly 
> interface stuff I still like
> 
>    the better search (spotlight doesn't seem to hang 1/2 way through 
> typing a search term)
>    better networking (doesn't stall for a full minute when a mounted 
> volume disappears).
>    better DVD player (much, much better!)
>    spaces (although it doesn't work when you are using keynote :-(
> 
> and of course all the good programmers sup****t underneath.
> 
> Dale

Thanks for the comments Dale. I'd certainly appreciate a brighter
Spotlight, though what I'd really like is some preference say on what
it displays. Having to click twice to get a filepath really ... hmmmm.

And does it sup****t bad programmers?  Anyway, I can always go back a
cat if the spots annoy me.


Emma